The 2026 State of Dealer Technology

Inaugural DealerSignals Tech Adoption Index — Baseline Edition

The average U.S. auto dealer runs just 3.8 of 15 core retail-technology categories — about a quarter of what’s available. Franchise dealers run nearly double what independents do. Here’s the first measured baseline of how much technology dealerships actually use.

---

How we measured this. The DealerSignals Tech Adoption Index (DTAI) is built by programmatically scanning the public web presence of 1,760 U.S. dealerships across 40 states and detecting the vendor technologies each one runs. It measures what dealers actually deploy — not what they self-report on a survey. This is the baseline edition (scan: May 2026, methodology v1.0). Future quarterly editions will track how these numbers move.

---

The headline: dealers run a quarter of the available stack

We group dealer technology into 15 measured categories — from websites and CRM to digital retailing and fixed-ops software. We then count, for each dealer, how many of those categories they have at least one tool running in. We call that number Stack Depth.

The average U.S. dealer’s Stack Depth is 3.8 — roughly 25% of the 15 categories available.

That single number reframes a lot of industry conversation. The retail-technology catalog dealers are sold is vast; the share any given store actually runs is small.

---

Finding 1 — Franchise dealers run nearly twice the tech of independents

The average masks a split that defines the whole market:

Dealer type	Dealers measured	Average Stack Depth
Franchise	775	5.2 categories
Independent	905	2.8 categories
Buy-Here-Pay-Here	80	2.1 categories

Franchise stores run 84% more technology categories than independents. The modern, OEM-pressured franchise stack and the lean independent storefront are, in measurable terms, two different worlds — and most of the U.S. dealer body lives on the lighter side of that line.

---

Finding 2 — Nearly half of all dealers run three categories or fewer

Stack Depth isn’t bunched around the average. It skews low, with a thin, sophisticated tail:

Categories run	Dealers	Share
0–3	853	48%
4–6	654	37%
7–9	237	13%
10+	16	1%

Almost half the market (48%) runs three or fewer of the 15 categories. Just 1% — 16 dealerships nationwide — run ten or more. The heavily-instrumented dealership is the rare exception, not the norm, and it is overwhelmingly franchise.

---

Finding 3 — The website paradox: everyone has the storefront, almost no one has the modern selling tools

Adoption collapses the moment you move past table-stakes presence:

• 79% of dealers run a dedicated website/digital-marketing platform — by far the most-adopted category.
• But only 9% run digital-retailing / online deal tools.
• And just 3% run video / 360° merchandising.

Dealers have the storefront. The tools that actually move a deal online — the ones the industry has spent a decade marketing — remain almost entirely unadopted.

---

Finding 4 — The most common dealer website platform is a tie, and one of them is WordPress

Inside the website category, the two leading platforms are neck and neck:

• Dealer.com — 31% of all dealers (547 stores)
• WordPress — 31% of all dealers (544 stores)

A purpose-built automotive platform and a general-purpose open-source CMS are essentially tied for the most common dealer website foundation in America. For a category everyone assumes is owned by the big automotive website vendors, that’s a genuinely surprising result.

---

The full category leaderboard

#	Category	Adoption	Leading vendor (share of all dealers)
1	Website & Digital Marketing	79%	Dealer.com (31%)
2	Listing Platforms	48%	Cars.com Badge (24%)
3	Inventory Management	43%	Carfax (22%)
4	Reputation Management	42%	CARFAX Verified (19%)
5	Paid Advertising & Attribution	30%	Foureyes (15%)
6	Chat & Messaging	27%	CarNow (12%)
7	Trade-In & Valuation	27%	Kelley Blue Book (15%)
8	CRM Platforms	19%	elead CRM (11%)
9	F&I Platforms	17%	Capital One Auto (13%)
10	DMS Platforms	17%	DealerCenter (11%)
11	Data & Analytics Tools	10%	Clarivoy (9%)
12	Fixed Ops Software	10%	Xtime (9%)
13	Online Deal Tools	9%	Roadster (4%)
14	Video & 360° Retailing	3%	Flick Fusion (2%)
15	In-House Finance	1%	PayMyCar (1%)

A telling pattern sits in the back office: CRM (19%), DMS (17%), and F&I (17%) — the systems that run the actual business of selling cars — trail the customer-facing storefront by a wide margin in detectable adoption.

---

Where dealers run the most (and least) technology

Among the 18 states with a large enough sample to compare (40+ dealers measured):

Most tech-dense states	Stack Depth
North Carolina	4.8
Indiana	4.6
Florida	4.4

Least tech-dense states	Stack Depth
Connecticut	2.9
Hawaii	3.4
Alabama	3.5

These gaps partly reflect each state’s mix of franchise vs. independent dealers, not state “sophistication” alone — a thread future editions will untangle.

---

A baseline, by design

This is the first edition of the DTAI, so there is no prior quarter to compare against yet — and we won’t manufacture a trend line that doesn’t exist. What this report establishes is the baseline: the reference point every future quarterly edition will measure movement against. The value of the Index compounds with each scan. A year from now, the story isn’t “3.8” — it’s whether 3.8 moved, in which categories, and for whom.

---

How to cite this report

DealerSignals Dealer Technology Adoption Index, May 2026 (Baseline Edition), methodology v1.0. dealersignals.com.

Full methodology, category definitions, and detection criteria: DealerSignals Tech Adoption Index — Methodology

---

Methodology & limitations (in brief)

The DTAI is derived from automated scans of dealers’ public web presence; a category counts for a dealer when at least one qualifying vendor “fingerprint” is detected. We count only primary vendor technologies — generic infrastructure such as ad pixels and analytics trackers is deliberately excluded, because counting it would overstate adoption. The Index reflects web-detectable technology, so purely back-office systems with no public footprint may be undercounted; it measures presence, not depth of use; and it is a point-in-time snapshot of the scan window. Coverage currently spans 1,760 dealers across 40 states and will expand in future editions. No data is self-reported.

Measured, not self-reported.